#i was just trolling the radfems

[doberbutts]

A collection of responses from my cishet men post:

"But cishet women do that too"

Yes I am aware and in fact have expressed the same negative opinion regarding it, largely "are the straights okay???"- and personally I think the behavior acts are a reinforcer of the patriarchy and the cishet women who do this are effectively shooting themselves in the foot.

"But gay men do that too"

Yes I am aware as someone who dates gay men and in fact have expressed the same negative opinion regarding it- but I also think femmephobia while fueled and caused by misogyny is coming from a different place than the misogyny cishet men display towards the women they're attracted to, and is more a bid for acceptance from cishet people in a homophobic world than from a place of actual power. That doesn't make it right, but I do think it's a bit different.

"Not all cishet men"

Yes I am aware as someone who has cishet men number among my friends- these men also express bafflement and disgust at the actions and worldviews I am complaining about because they love their partners very dearly and would never act like so much a jerk towards them.

"This is just misogyny"

Yes I know. I am calling it misogyny. I am using my position as a man to call out misogyny in my fellow men. I am saying these guys suck because they are being misogynists.

"Finally a man has noticed what women have been saying"

Deeply unnecessary. Do you want men to correct other men when they see bad behavior, or not? You can't tell dudes to come collect their mess and then deride them when they do so.

"I also would break up with someone if she took pictures of her lattes or dyed her hair pink"

Unfunny trolling and tar pit ass behavior. Fuck you.

"#yesallwomen"

This is a radfem phrase and I WILL fling you into the sun for it, so help me.

-

To the rest of you who understood what I was saying and actually engaged critically- thank you. Didn't expect that post to get 13k in a couple days but here we are. Mostly I was just expressing frustration because I've heard multiple people reference it in my day to day, offline, life and am sick of it. I can't imagine being such a turd as to so objectively hate the person I'm attracted to. But misogyny really does give you brain worms.

[kkoffin]

live laugh love normalise blocking people who do nothing more than waste ur time

if you read something and you think “jesus that’s so stupid” do not follow up with “i need to point out how stupid this is”. everyone knows how stupid it is. just block them and move on. If a post is tagged “fucking radfems” you are likely not gonna be changing their opinion. unless your reply to a stupid reblog is something you want to share, something you want to say, and their comment helps your point, then don’t bother. Don’t waste paragraphs on trolls. go write a book instead.

[lorynna]

The YouAreBased blog is pro-rape and pro-male supremacy. The entire blog is about hating on women, feminists and heterosexual women. Are they going to magically end the patriarchy by generalizing women as these dumb bitches who deserve to have no rights? I wonder if that blog is run by an incel who’s trying to infiltrate radfem spaces as a hateful platform against women so they can promote their usual semen-science bullshit or blame women for everything.

totally 100% with you here. there are a lot of theories going around wether it is TRAs trying infiltrate our spaces and get radfems to agree with those talking points or if it could be actual incel trolls. I'm very much convinced that specifically @youarebased is a male in disguise. I just can't imagine that a woman could post such things. Ofc I could be totally mistaken and @youarebased could be a severely mentally ill woman.

Sadly I'm also convinced of the authenticity of some few female blackpill aligned users on here and I am sure that they truly believe in what they preach.

I remember when I made a post about blackpill ideology some weeks ago saying that it is really similar to inceldom, especially in terminology and the outrage was big, even from some other radfems - but I think they've seen for themselves now.

Every now and then someone shows up demanding evidence and then pulls a "no true scotsman" when seeing the blackpill receipts. Uh yeah.

[limeade-l3sbian]

That interaction with spoonbread or whatever is the perfect example of how my preconceived notions around "terfs" and radfems have shattered over time being on this godforsaken app. Time after time I would see posts like "omg I can't believe terfs say/believe (something they made up or misconstrued) and whenever I'd go into the notes or reblogs and see them getting confronted with this, without fail, they'd stick their heads in the sand. The longer I've been on here the more I've realized how people will just believe anything about a group of people that a few have successfully made into the ultimate tumblr boogeyman (despite the aforementioned lack of political power or lack of real-life harm they've inflicted) the longer these weirdos insist that a bunch of feminists are actually just this scary group of online right-wing fascists and NEVER being able to back it up, the funnier it gets.

First, I'm glad to hear that. Second, that is pretty much the #1 reason I've seen from womyn who have messaged me about radical feminism. I'm not insisting that there are HUNDREDS of messages of womyn saying they "saw the light" lol,, but too many who said, "I was in a group of people who told me to just stay away from radical feminists and when I decided to hate scroll one day, I didn't see any of what they were saying."

To be fair, that user is a troll (as I was told later) and I think he abandoned the interaction because the intention was to get me riled up and typing out 10+ paragraphs of theory while he just sent articles to biased sources and said, "JKR bad." I had that happen a week ago as well. Arguing with me and unable to answer basic questions.

This goes for radical feminism and any and every ideology, movement, idea, etc.: If you see something being wholly condemned by the masses, look into the why for yourself. That doesn't mean that every group that falls under that criteria is good or bad. It is an objective statement. Understand why a group is "evil" or worth avoiding. Don't leave it to word of mouth. See with your own eyes what is being suppressed and make that decision on your own.

In some instances, it will be valid (nazis, qanon, moms for liberty, etc.) but always check things for yourself and ALWAYS be wary of any group that is telling you to avoid looking into a group or threatening to "other" you if you do or ask questions.

[kiefbowl]

Why don't you identify as a radfem? Just curious if there are some things in radical feminism you disagree with or what

I feel that feminist suits me just well and describes my views. Anecdotally, I think on tumblr at least, the discourse that "dictates" who is a radical feminist and what radical feminism is mostly coming from a place of nescience. It's not that people are necessarily wrong or that, as a movement, radical feminism must remain unchanged, but rather social media in general averages young, so there is a bit of the blind leading the blind. I think it's common for people to puff up their experience and knowledge online in order to make a scathing point (and I'll admit, I think I've done it, too). It's not a value judgement, just an observation. However, it makes me uninterested in participating in that discussion especially when I'm not so certain I would agree I'm a radical feminist even if there was a consensus on the tenets, both of the past and what they are today. So, I just opt out. Or, maybe sometimes I dip my toe in :)

I think also as I've gotten older I've made choices not welcomed by some radical feminists, which could be trolls or could be genuine. I'm marrying a man in 8 months, and I'm thinking of having children, among other things. I don't care if that's a problem for other feminists, they can think of me as they please, but I certainly don't care about a label enough to try to argue with them about it. If a large enough group of people say "you can't be a radical feminist while marrying a man" and I want to marry that man, well then why do I care if I get called a radical feminist or not? It's nothing to me, it's just words. I have my own code I live by and I think I live by it well so that's that.

[aalexan]

I don't do any callouts but...

Please block this person, if you can: @/androgynousnightmentality

They're an extremely disgusting person who is a biphobe and an albeist. They wish that pregnant women suffer from a miscarriage. They also call women degrading slurs.

yep I’ve seen them. they’re really awful. Don’t know if it’s actually an ex radfem or a moid troll lol but I recommend any radfem just blocks instead of interacting

[xxactlyperfect]

FWIW theangryfujo is a troll whether she intends to be or not, I think aggressive bad faith is just how she copes with not being able to effectively respond to radfem arguments. plus TIF angst. Don’t feel compelled to waste your time with her goalpost shifting and random videos unless you’re having fun with it!

Hi, thanks for the ask.

I genuinely believed for a second there's actually an account called "theangryfujo" and thought they might've blocked me since nothing popped up. Anyway, I don't necessarily agree with this.

I have already put some hours into analyzing and watching the video and I will be posting about it as a response to @theangryman

So far, it has been interesting, although I'm getting tired. But I don't like echo-chambers (despite being accused of it), and it's also a fine analysis practice. Not that it's gonna be revolutionary, but stay tuned.

[transfemme-shelterdog]

I'm fuckin scared shitless to make my own post about this but I felt like you could have an opinion possibly, oh dear random stranger; is it just trolls pretending to be trans women who are saying all these posts about

"trans mascs always bring up pregnancy as to why they're oppressed, but ignore that pregnancy is an equal source of dysphoria for trans fems too?"

I have seen at least two posts with similar phrasing to this recently and more on very similar topics of reproductive healthcare. And I find it interesting framing because, isn't the main reason trans mascs speak of pregnancy and abortion care is because pregnancy is highly potentially fatal? Not because it's dysphoria inducing?

Should these posts be just ignored as they are bait, is my algorithm just fucked and I need to fix it, or should I be speaking up on these topics?

I think it really depends on the person. I've met men/mascs for both sides.

The trans men I've talked to about pregnancy, have either talked about how it would be dysphoria inducing to get pregnant (The changes that happen to your body, leaving permanently feminine effects such as wider hips/larger chest), or how there's a risk of damage (diabetes, osteoporosis, brain fog) that they don't want to endure.

There's also the issue that if you are stealth, and don't have access to abortion, it's a great way to get outed. That's another issue that comes up.

Now as for whether women who talk about dysphoria are trolls, I doubt it. I think it's a case of trans radfems who do have dysphoria about being unable to get pregnant (I have that dysphoria myself), taking it out on people who can get pregnant but don't want to. "You're blessed with the ability so why are you wasting it you asshole" type logic.

[kkoffin]

hey I recognized the beginning of this post as being stolen from one of yours... are there fr anti feminist bots now trying to troll us like this? this isn't the first one I've seen, it's just the first one where I recognized the specific source post

https://www.tumblr.com/mallwalker922/770192216530485248/stop-hating-your-womb-and-making-caricatures-of?source=share

(the ai generated post in mention)

(my post)

I haven’t come across these… longer-form ai radfem posts before, only the short ones which are entirely nonsensical. It’s interesting to see how it’s just taking full sentences, not even… generating??? anything? almost like a middle schooler’s plagiarised essay, like it’s human-made.

it’s also interesting to take one of my posts which is not… “terfy”? like this post was reblogged by a lot of TIFs as well, it’s not “transphobic” at all, it’s just. feminist. it’s just pro-woman. These ai generated posts are not fighting “transphobia” they are just fighting feminism, i wonder if the creators of these wastes of water and resources know that? especially these longer form ones - they aren’t just to waste our time or spam our tags and trick the system, they are mocking us. not “terfs” but female people and feminists.

anyways this is weird

[a-griffin-in-the-sky]

Hope you got raped at your job! Or you do at your next one :3 maybe learn to shut up and keep your head down you retarded skank

You slid into my inbox with a rape threat like that violence still works on me.

You told me to shut up and keep my head down. You called me a slur. You threw rape in my face like that would make me docile.

That’s patriarchal conditioning speaking through you, whether you’re a man, a trans woman, or just some troll pretending to be either. Doesn��t matter. You’re parroting the same tactics that have been used to silence women for centuries.

You don’t scare me. You just remind me of why I speak up in the first place.

I’m done being polite to people who think violence is an acceptable response to critique. You don’t get to claim moral high ground while throwing rape threats at women who won’t grovel.

I’ve been circling this so-called “activist” space, trying to help, trying to offer solidarity, trying to understand. But this? This is what keeps pushing me away.

If your version of justice requires women to be silent, afraid, and degraded into objects you can control with threats, you are not fighting oppression.

Anyway radfems here is my kofi link if you wanna help me out, still trying to make my goal for August.

[pisceanpharies]

Now that I've been hilariously accused of being a troll account cause I stopped posting Spock stuff in December and started posting radfem and then blackpilled stuff, I feel the warm and fuzzies today.

The radblr schizos still love me 🥰😆😆😆.

Btw, if anyone misses Spock and the other media stuff I used to reblog, I made a blog just for tv stuff, back when I changed the focus of this blog.

[lesbianp1lled]

Hi, can I vent about something? Last year some radfem troll posted screenshots of my blog on that website too because I said something she didn't like. The poster admitted that I'm a minor, yet she still felt no shame or hesitance while doing that.

I didn't learn about that for a month but fortunately despite being tempted by girls I was following who were posting their selfies, I was still lazy to post mine as well during that time but imagine if I had done that... My life would've been ruined since selfies stay their forever and the radfems trolls love to spread selfies of doxxed girls they hate all over that website.

I already had ocd and developed a new ocd and compulsively checked it thousands of times even though I knew I never posted any but still just to be sure.

I was already skeptical of radfems since they're lesbophobic as fuck and have no shame in using f slurs and r slurs against gay men and the mentally disabled women they hate/people. But after this experience I just fucking hate radfems as a whole. They're just trolls pretending to be feminists

What were they saying about you? Sorry that happened. They are too cowardly to say it to our faces and post us on anonymous websites because they are pathetic

[r0ad-k1ll-cub]

☠︎︎WELCOME 2 DA WOODS ☠︎︎

> this is my agere blog for soft sometimes sad regression, primal comfort, and weird emo baby feelings.

if you’re here for “aesthetic” agere with perfect days and pastels only —

you’re in the wrong daycare. this is where the wild things nap and scream.

My og blog is @skunkboydreams

WHAT I POST:

☣︎ sad little agere vents

☣︎ grungecore regression moodboards

☣︎ therian-coded agere (because i still miss being a pup)

☣︎ crayon scribbles + coloring pages

☣︎ communication cards + blank templates

☣︎ agere fanfics & headcanons

☣︎ toy shop hauls

☣︎ little babbles

☣︎ paci edits of my favorite characters

WHO I AM

dondon / tem

he / it / stink / star

18 - minors DNI

regresses to 4-6 (teen regression 13-16)

emo age regressor

skunk and hyena babie

not cutesy, just weird and small

cries about animal memories and juice

regression is ✨ involuntary ✨ sometimes

primal baby vibes — howl, nap, cry, repeat

Nicknames ppl can call me:

littles: skunkie, sib, bro, temmie (another name I haz)

cgs: little one, champ, buddy, kiddo (no fem terms)

DNI!

ddlg / kink / nsfw

maps / zoos

terfs / radfems / truscum / transmeds

cops / bootlickers

endo “systems”

anti-therian or “cringe culture” trolls

ableists / anti-psych people

people who hate “weird” regressors

fetish blogs in ANY form

if u think regressors have to be pastel or “cute” to be valid

anyone who makes fun of kids like me

☣︎ FINAL THOUGHTS ☣︎

this blog is for the weird kids, the little animals, the ones who growl when they stim and cry when they miss their paws.

it’s for the ones who regress out of grief, out of comfort, out of instinct.

it’s not cute — it’s survival.

[ventbloglite]

The sad thing is - I think it's actually very terribly easy if you're trans femme to believe that trans masc people are out to get you.

We've been raised on 'woman vs man' all of our lives. We've all internalised it as sacred truth.

Why disbelieve it now? Even as trans people it's so very difficult to not see 'woman' and 'man' as directly opposites with no overlap, natural enemies with 'men' as the villain (because there must be a villain, right?). Doing so is so much easier than actually wrapping your mind around and thus trying to dismantle the many systems which exist to enforce the patriarchy and it's narrow definition of 'acceptable manhood' to boot.

And it's not like feminists have never or don't understand that there's many little systems that need to be tackled. We fight for gender neutrality in job titles 'fire fighter not fireman' for example even though it seems petty because we understand that man=default is one of those systems. This is before we even get to the glass ceiling, pay gap, the misogyny of many medical systems etc.

It's just that for many it's easier to see all men as equally privleged and evil and therefore unable to have any issues, so surely faking it for attention or to speak over women if they do.

There used to be such a thing as 'mens liberation'. This involved undoing the misogynistic beliefs men had grown up with and tackling toxic masculinity etc. Basically trying to create healthier, happier and more informed men who would happily defend a feminist cause because they realise the cause benefits all.

It is the direct opposite of 'MRAs' who seek to believe much like radfems that the 'opposite sex' is the root cause of all of their suffering and should be completely wiped out or placed under subservience at best without actually (again) looking at or trying to grasp the many systems of oppression with exist and how to genuinely tackle the issues they're facing.

MRAs = animal rights/PETA types if that helps MensLib = animal welfare (actually caring about animals)

But in that same way trans masc (and even a good amount of trans femme and trans neu people who understand transandrophobia) who speak about the oppression they face FROM CIS PEOPLE AND CISNORMATIVE SOCIETY (with maybe a sprinkling of lamentation about lack of intercommunity support or specific things a specific trans femme has said which isn't any more ok than any trans masc being openly transmisogynistic) are 'animal welfare' types. They know what they're going through and just want a word to describe it.

But like I said, it's so easy, I know, as a trans femme to just believe when people tell you that this is another wave of men oppressing you. That they must be the same as MRAs because men are inherently privleged. That these anons claiming to be trans mascs targetting trans women for hate must be actual trans mascs because ofc men hate women, even though it could be literally anyone on anon including troll shit-stirrers.

It's honestly not a blameable offence to believe it when it's all we've known and been told. Men hate women, so obviously trans men hate trans women, right?

Cishet men are privleged, so obviously all kinds of men are privileged, right?

The hard part is going to be undoing that. Men and women are not opposites. Trans men and trans women are not opposites. We are not enemies with trans neu people being forced to pick sides or stay away and be called ignorant. It's not fun or good to relish in the suffering of another group, and it's not feminist to think that somebodies gender automatically gives them x, y or z negative traits.

[hello-nichya-here]

Hello there my Queen! Do you know what day it is today? It's International Nichya Appreciation Day! And we celebrate every year cause we would have a Zucest event without you. Here's is a poem I wrote in your honor, I've been working on it for all of several weeks and seventeen minutes.

Ode to Nichya (of Fire and Sass)

In the jungles of some hellhole where tar souls go to die,

Rests a legend named Nichya — a girl, nay, a vibe.

You don't need to go that hard. But I'm go glad that you do.

Brazilian-born, and drama-fed,

With anons in her inbox wishing her dead.

But lo! She replies with a laugh and a roar,

Leaving salty trolls face-down on the floor.

Devastation. Mic drop.

Her takes, spicy as her, they whisper her controversial name.

"She's unhinged!" the radfems cry. "She's bold and unfair!"

But you don't rise to royalty by playing it square.

Hinges are a scam anyway.

The anons may tremble, the dashboard may shake,

But Nichya just spills the tea and raises the stakes.

She's the queen of the mess, the drama, the fight,

Putting people in their place with delight.

So here's to our leader, a menace and a muse,

With humor and hot takes no hater could refuse.

Royalty without a blue check, crowned by community consensus.

Long live her reign, through scroll and reblog —

The Zucest crown rests on her blog.

This is soooooo sweet! And the lines "In the jungles of some hellhole where tar souls go to die" and "drama-fed" are accurate as fuck.

[a-griffin-in-the-sky]

A public Radfem Responce to my male Agression Pattern post.

There’s a difference between feeding the trolls and making art. One is a waste of energy. The other is a reclamation of it.

When someone launches a bad-faith attack, your first instinct might be to fire back. To correct them. Defend yourself. Make them see. But trolls don’t want clarity. They don’t wish to discuss. They want spectacle. They want you off balance, shouting, wasting your breath while they play both victim and aggressor. They thrive on immediacy and that knee-jerk flare of anger that keeps the focus off their hollow posturing.

Don’t give them that satisfaction.

Instead, take the screenshot. Step away. Sit with it, not in shame, but in curiosity. Look at their words like an autopsy. What are they projecting? What are they deflecting from? What tactics do they use, and what are those tactics meant to obscure? Often, you’ll find hypocrisy, fragility, and fear that's all dressed up as smug certainty. Give yourself the time to see the structure of their cruelty. Then dismantle it. Slowly. Publicly. Beautifully. Not out of revenge, but as documentation.

You are allowed to show people what these performances are. You’re allowed to turn their tactics inside out and hold them up to the light. Not to fuel more fighting, but to make others feel less alone. To interrupt the cycle. To see the patterns. To turn a moment of targeted malice into a lasting statement.

Block them. Mute them. Remove them from your space. Let them scream into the void while you move forward with purpose. The point is not to stay silent, it’s to be strategic. Your voice is better spent creating something that outlives their noise.

Remember: they want chaos. They want us divided. They want us to be too busy squabbling with each other to notice their contradictions and see how little they stand for. Don’t just react. Respond. Thoughtfully. Sharply. With something that leaves a mark, not a scar but a signature.

You don’t owe trolls a performance. You owe yourself the power of deliberate creation.

There’s a pattern I keep seeing, and it’s not a coincidence. I’ll post something hard, something real, something about the aggression that women face from people socialized into male entitlement, especially when those people now claim the category of womanhood themselves. And every time, without fail, the replies start twisting. Not toward the content. Not toward the argument. But toward me.

Suddenly, it’s not about what I said, it’s about how I said it, or why I made it. My tone. My anger. My audacity. There’s no engagement with the actual dynamic I’m describing. No curiosity. No accountability. Just tone-policing, derailment, and moral posturing. “You’re being too harsh.” “You should be kinder.” “You’re alienating people.” "Don't waste your time."

All of it serves one purpose: to deflect from the core issue and make sure we don’t look too closely at male-pattern behavior, especially when it’s coming from people who now claim a different label.

This is how trolls operate. This is how silencing works. First they bait you. Then they reframe your reaction as the problem. They don't want you calm. They don't want you angry either. They want you exhausted, explaining yourself again and again while they shift the goalposts. They pretend it’s a conversation, but it’s really a performance a trap meant to drain you and confuse the people watching.

Let’s get back to the real topic:

There is a very real pattern of trans women, particularly those steeped in male socialization, using threats, aggression, and manipulative tactics against women. And when women name that behavior, we’re called bigots, Terfs, Bitchs, Cunts, Whore, ect. When we express fear or boundaries, we’re accused of violence. But we are allowed to talk about power. We are allowed to talk about patterns. We are allowed to say no.

Male-pattern violence doesn’t disappear with a name change. It doesn’t dissolve because someone adopts a new identity. And women, especially survivors, can feel when that aggression is still present. We see it in the threats. The intimidation. The entitlement to our spaces, our bodies, our silence. That’s the conversation. That’s the thing so many people are working hard to derail.

So no, I won’t get lost in a dozen arguments about tone. I won’t let trolls and apologists center themselves in a conversation meant to highlight harm. You can tell a lot about people by how quickly they abandon the actual subject and turn their attention to controlling you.

We are allowed to name the pattern. We are allowed to speak clearly about the ways women, especially those of us who’ve survived male violence, feel cornered, dismissed, and unsafe. And we’re allowed to do it on our own terms.

Let the trolls flail. Let them talk about everything except what matters and what we know, what we’ve seen. We know what we’ve felt and what we are.

(this took a while to write but here is a follow up,I hope you read this with an open mind)